County Civil Court: APPELLATE PROCEDURE – preservation of error – appellate court
cannot address claims that were not framed by the pleadings or litigated by the
parties – without a transcript or statement of the evidence, Appellant has
failed to demonstrate error – Amended Final Judgment affirmed. Hansen
v. Manatee Car & Truck Sales, Inc., No. 05-0003AP-88A (
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND
APPELLATE DIVISION
MICHAEL HANSEN,
Appellant, Appeal No. 05-0003AP-88A
UCN522005AP000003XXXXCV
vs.
MANATEE CAR & TRUCK SALES, INC.,
d/b/a PAYLESS CAR RENTAL and
JENNIFER WEEKS, Regional Manager,
Appellees,
_______________________________________/
Appeal from Amended Final Judgment
Judge Henry J. Andringa
Michael Hansen
Appellant, pro se
David A. Bacon, Esquire
Attorney for the Appellee
ORDER AND OPINION
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on appeal, filed by the Appellant, Michael Hansen (Hansen), from the Amended Final Judgment, entered December 9, 2004, in favor of the Appellees, Manatee Car & Truck Sales, Inc., d/b/a Payless Car Rental and Jennifer Weeks, Regional Manager (Manatee Car & Truck Sales). Upon review of the briefs, the record and being otherwise fully advised, the Court affirms the trial court’s ruling as set forth below.
The record shows that Manatee Car & Truck Sales, doing business as Payless Car Rental, employed Hansen from approximately October 22, 2003, until December 29, 2003. During that time period, Manatee Car & Truck Sales issued payroll checks to Hansen through Bobby Smith Auto Sales, Inc. (Bobby Smith Auto Sales), an affiliated corporation. After Hansen’s employment was terminated, Hansen sent a demand letter to Manatee Car & Truck Sales requesting payment in the amount of $1,772.70, which he asserted was the amount of outstanding unpaid commissions. Manatee Car & Truck Sales did not respond to the letter. Thereafter, Hansen filed a Statement of Claim alleging breach of contract for failure to pay $ 1,772.70 in commissions and wrongful discharge as a result of defamation by Jennifer Weeks. Following a non-jury trial, the trial court entered a Final Judgment in favor of Manatee Car & Truck Sales.
Before
this Court, Hansen argues that the trial court erred in its ruling as the
Statute of Frauds bars payments made by Bobby Smith Auto Sales to Hansen on
behalf of Manatee Car & Truck Sales.
Hansen also argues, under the doctrine of account stated, that certain
amounts became due when Manatee Car & Truck Sales failed to respond to his demand
letter. Initially, the Court finds that
it cannot address these issues as there is no record evidence that these claims
were framed by the pleadings or litigated by the parties. See Herskovitz v. Herskovitz,
910 So.2d 366, 367 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)(explaining that appellate court will not
consider issues raised on appeal that were not presented to the trial
court); see also Gordon v.
Gordon, 543 So.2d 428, 429 (
Further,
and more importantly, the Court finds that there is not a transcript, nor
statement of the evidence, from the trial below. The well-settled law in
Therefore, it is,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Amended Final Judgment is affirmed.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at
________________________________
JOHN A. SCHAEFER
Circuit Judge, Appellate Division
_______________________________ ______________________________
LAUREN
LAUGHLIN JAMES
CASE
Circuit Judge, Appellate Division Circuit Judge, Appellate Division
Copies furnished to:
Judge Henry J. Andringa
Michael Hansen
David A. Bacon, Esquire
Post Office Box 13576